<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (9) TMI 231 - ITAT BOMBAY-F</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59432</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision that interest income had not accrued to the assessee. The reversal of accounting entries was deemed justified due to the absence of a legally enforceable right to interest. The corporate veil was not lifted, as the companies were considered independent entities. The decision emphasized that taxability hinges on the legal right to receive income, not solely on accounting entries.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2012 15:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=97883" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (9) TMI 231 - ITAT BOMBAY-F</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59432</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision that interest income had not accrued to the assessee. The reversal of accounting entries was deemed justified due to the absence of a legally enforceable right to interest. The corporate veil was not lifted, as the companies were considered independent entities. The decision emphasized that taxability hinges on the legal right to receive income, not solely on accounting entries.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59432</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>