<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (6) TMI 215 - ITAT BOMBAY-F</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59431</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed both appeals, holding that penalties imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the IT Act for the assessment years 1993-94 and 1994-95 were not sustainable. It emphasized that surrendering income during a survey does not automatically indicate concealment. The tribunal found the penalties unjustified as similar facts in the assessment year 1995-96 did not attract penalties. Explanations by the assessee were disregarded, leading to the decision to delete the penalties for the mentioned years, providing relief to the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2012 12:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=97882" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (6) TMI 215 - ITAT BOMBAY-F</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59431</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed both appeals, holding that penalties imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the IT Act for the assessment years 1993-94 and 1994-95 were not sustainable. It emphasized that surrendering income during a survey does not automatically indicate concealment. The tribunal found the penalties unjustified as similar facts in the assessment year 1995-96 did not attract penalties. Explanations by the assessee were disregarded, leading to the decision to delete the penalties for the mentioned years, providing relief to the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59431</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>