https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59429 The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decisions to delete and restrict the additions made by the AO in the case. The Tribunal emphasized the lack of substantial evidence and improper application of legal provisions by the AO. As a result, the appeals were partly allowed in favor of the assessee, leading to the deletion of various additions related to inflated expenses, unexplained investments, annual letting value, Hundi loans, and additional profit on work-in-progress. en-us Tue, 25 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 19 Jun 2012 18:57:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59429 The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decisions to delete and restrict the additions made by the AO in the case. The Tribunal emphasized the lack of substantial evidence and improper application of legal provisions by the AO. As a result, the appeals were partly allowed in favor of the assessee, leading to the deletion of various additions related to inflated expenses, unexplained investments, annual letting value, Hundi loans, and additional profit on work-in-progress. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 25 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59429