<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (9) TMI 295 - ITAT BOMBAY-F</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59427</link>
    <description>The ITAT remanded the issue of addition of Rs. 8 lacs under section 68 of the Income Tax Act to the AO for fresh consideration, allowing the assessee to present evidence. The ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee on the second issue, deleting the addition of Rs. 30 lacs on account of unrecorded receipts due to lack of concrete evidence and emphasizing the importance of corroborative evidence in tax matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2012 15:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=97878" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (9) TMI 295 - ITAT BOMBAY-F</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59427</link>
      <description>The ITAT remanded the issue of addition of Rs. 8 lacs under section 68 of the Income Tax Act to the AO for fresh consideration, allowing the assessee to present evidence. The ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee on the second issue, deleting the addition of Rs. 30 lacs on account of unrecorded receipts due to lack of concrete evidence and emphasizing the importance of corroborative evidence in tax matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59427</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>