<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (1) TMI 212 - ITAT BOMBAY-F</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59414</link>
    <description>Interest under sections 234A and 234B could not be sustained where the assessment order contained no specific levy and the demand notice attempted to introduce it for the first time. The Tribunal applied binding precedent that such interest must be charged with reference to the returned income and only when the assessment order directs its levy. On that basis, deletion of the interest was upheld and the Department&#039;s appeal failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2010 15:37:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=97865" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (1) TMI 212 - ITAT BOMBAY-F</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59414</link>
      <description>Interest under sections 234A and 234B could not be sustained where the assessment order contained no specific levy and the demand notice attempted to introduce it for the first time. The Tribunal applied binding precedent that such interest must be charged with reference to the returned income and only when the assessment order directs its levy. On that basis, deletion of the interest was upheld and the Department&#039;s appeal failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59414</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>