<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (1) TMI 233 - ITAT BOMBAY-F</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59407</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the unabsorbed investment allowance brought forward was fully set off against the income computed under normal provisions, thus not available to be carried forward under Section 115J. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was allowed, overturning the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, and the Assessing Officer&#039;s decision was restored.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2010 15:10:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=97858" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (1) TMI 233 - ITAT BOMBAY-F</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59407</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the unabsorbed investment allowance brought forward was fully set off against the income computed under normal provisions, thus not available to be carried forward under Section 115J. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was allowed, overturning the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, and the Assessing Officer&#039;s decision was restored.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59407</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>