<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (11) TMI 247 - ITAT BOMBAY-F</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59405</link>
    <description>The appeal was partly allowed. The Tribunal upheld the exclusion of dividend and house property income from eligible business profit for the purposes of section 32AB but directed that only the net house property income, after deducting actual expenses, should be excluded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2010 15:05:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=97856" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (11) TMI 247 - ITAT BOMBAY-F</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59405</link>
      <description>The appeal was partly allowed. The Tribunal upheld the exclusion of dividend and house property income from eligible business profit for the purposes of section 32AB but directed that only the net house property income, after deducting actual expenses, should be excluded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59405</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>