https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59404 The appeal was dismissed with the Tribunal upholding the rejection of the appellant's claim for deduction under section 80RR. The Tribunal found that the appellant's profession as a commentator and presenter of cricket programs did not qualify for the deduction as an 'artist' or 'actor' as per the provisions of section 80RR. Additionally, the Tribunal held that the levy of interest under sections 234B and 234C was mandatory and compensatory, not requiring a separate order by the Assessing Officer. en-us Mon, 27 May 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 29 Dec 2010 15:00:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59404 The appeal was dismissed with the Tribunal upholding the rejection of the appellant's claim for deduction under section 80RR. The Tribunal found that the appellant's profession as a commentator and presenter of cricket programs did not qualify for the deduction as an 'artist' or 'actor' as per the provisions of section 80RR. Additionally, the Tribunal held that the levy of interest under sections 234B and 234C was mandatory and compensatory, not requiring a separate order by the Assessing Officer. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 27 May 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59404