<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (5) TMI 121 - ITAT BOMBAY-E</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59400</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal. It upheld the initiation of reassessment proceedings, the disallowance of depreciation on land, and the taxation of interest on the IT refund. However, it deleted the disallowance of advertisement expenses, concluding that the expenditure was incurred wholly and exclusively for the assessee&#039;s business purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2023 14:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=97851" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (5) TMI 121 - ITAT BOMBAY-E</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59400</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal. It upheld the initiation of reassessment proceedings, the disallowance of depreciation on land, and the taxation of interest on the IT refund. However, it deleted the disallowance of advertisement expenses, concluding that the expenditure was incurred wholly and exclusively for the assessee&#039;s business purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59400</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>