<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (12) TMI 229 - ITAT BOMBAY-E</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59398</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on the principle of mutuality, transfer fees, and TDR premium, while remitting the issue of allowable expenditure back to the AO for further examination. The appeal by the assessee was partly allowed, and the appeal by the Revenue was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2013 14:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=97849" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (12) TMI 229 - ITAT BOMBAY-E</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59398</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on the principle of mutuality, transfer fees, and TDR premium, while remitting the issue of allowable expenditure back to the AO for further examination. The appeal by the assessee was partly allowed, and the appeal by the Revenue was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59398</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>