<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (1) TMI 420 - ITAT BOMBAY-E</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59385</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, a partnership firm, granting the deduction under Section 80-IB(10) of the IT Act for the &#039;Nisarg&#039; project. It determined that &#039;Nisarg&#039; and &#039;Breezy Corner&#039; were separate projects, thus meeting the built-up area requirements. The shopping area restriction did not apply as the project was approved before the relevant amendment. Completion certificates for the &#039;Nisarg&#039; wings were obtained within the required timeframe, satisfying statutory conditions. Consequently, the AO&#039;s objections were dismissed, and the assessee&#039;s appeal was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2024 12:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=97836" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (1) TMI 420 - ITAT BOMBAY-E</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59385</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, a partnership firm, granting the deduction under Section 80-IB(10) of the IT Act for the &#039;Nisarg&#039; project. It determined that &#039;Nisarg&#039; and &#039;Breezy Corner&#039; were separate projects, thus meeting the built-up area requirements. The shopping area restriction did not apply as the project was approved before the relevant amendment. Completion certificates for the &#039;Nisarg&#039; wings were obtained within the required timeframe, satisfying statutory conditions. Consequently, the AO&#039;s objections were dismissed, and the assessee&#039;s appeal was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59385</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>