<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (8) TMI 368 - ITAT BOMBAY-E</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59379</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the AO&#039;s decision to tax the royalty income accrued to the assessee based on the agreement with UPT, despite UPT&#039;s dispute over the services rendered. The Tribunal found that under the mercantile system, income is recognized when the right to receive income is acquired, and in this case, the right to royalty was acquired upon providing services and became due upon UPT&#039;s sales. Therefore, the Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, overturning the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 1,35,00,000 made by the AO.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2012 18:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=97830" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (8) TMI 368 - ITAT BOMBAY-E</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59379</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the AO&#039;s decision to tax the royalty income accrued to the assessee based on the agreement with UPT, despite UPT&#039;s dispute over the services rendered. The Tribunal found that under the mercantile system, income is recognized when the right to receive income is acquired, and in this case, the right to royalty was acquired upon providing services and became due upon UPT&#039;s sales. Therefore, the Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, overturning the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 1,35,00,000 made by the AO.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59379</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>