<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (1) TMI 418 - ITAT BOMBAY-E</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59375</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that income from parking and visiting charges, as well as income from the sale of scrap, was attributable to the main banking business of the assessee. Therefore, deductions under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 were allowed, overturning the decisions of the CIT(A) and AO. The appeal of the assessee was fully allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2010 12:53:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=97826" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (1) TMI 418 - ITAT BOMBAY-E</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59375</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that income from parking and visiting charges, as well as income from the sale of scrap, was attributable to the main banking business of the assessee. Therefore, deductions under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 were allowed, overturning the decisions of the CIT(A) and AO. The appeal of the assessee was fully allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59375</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>