<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (6) TMI 224 - ITAT BOMBAY-E</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59364</link>
    <description>The ITAT concluded that the block assessment order dated September 30, 1999, was barred by the limitation period under section 158BE of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The search was deemed concluded on July 29, 1997, and the subsequent panchnama dated September 8, 1997, was invalid for extending the limitation period. Consequently, the block assessment order was declared illegal and cancelled, resulting in the appeal being allowed in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2024 14:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=97816" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (6) TMI 224 - ITAT BOMBAY-E</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59364</link>
      <description>The ITAT concluded that the block assessment order dated September 30, 1999, was barred by the limitation period under section 158BE of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The search was deemed concluded on July 29, 1997, and the subsequent panchnama dated September 8, 1997, was invalid for extending the limitation period. Consequently, the block assessment order was declared illegal and cancelled, resulting in the appeal being allowed in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59364</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>