<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (12) TMI 306 - ITAT BOMBAY-E</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59325</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, deleting the additions of Rs. 1,48,741 and Rs. 43,15,00,000, emphasizing the importance of following procedural directions and ensuring that the same income is not taxed twice. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was based on the failure of the AO to comply with specific directions and the lack of evidence to support the additions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2010 10:29:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=97778" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (12) TMI 306 - ITAT BOMBAY-E</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59325</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, deleting the additions of Rs. 1,48,741 and Rs. 43,15,00,000, emphasizing the importance of following procedural directions and ensuring that the same income is not taxed twice. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was based on the failure of the AO to comply with specific directions and the lack of evidence to support the additions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59325</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>