<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (4) TMI 90 - ITAT BOMBAY-E</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59313</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the ITO&#039;s order allowing the set-off of losses for the trust was lawful under Sections 72 and 80 of the IT Act. The CIT&#039;s order under Section 263 was reversed, reinstating the ITO&#039;s original order. The Tribunal determined that the trust, not the beneficiaries, was the rightful assessee for carrying forward and setting off losses. The appeal was allowed, confirming the trust&#039;s entitlement to offset losses against its income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 17:30:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=97766" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (4) TMI 90 - ITAT BOMBAY-E</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59313</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the ITO&#039;s order allowing the set-off of losses for the trust was lawful under Sections 72 and 80 of the IT Act. The CIT&#039;s order under Section 263 was reversed, reinstating the ITO&#039;s original order. The Tribunal determined that the trust, not the beneficiaries, was the rightful assessee for carrying forward and setting off losses. The appeal was allowed, confirming the trust&#039;s entitlement to offset losses against its income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59313</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>