<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (9) TMI 85 - ITAT BOMBAY-E</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59306</link>
    <description>Penalty under section 15B of the Wealth-tax Act was held unwarranted where the assessee&#039;s outstanding income-tax refund exceeded the wealth-tax liability and repeated requests had been made for adjustment or release before filing the return. The non-payment of wealth-tax was treated as attributable to the revenue&#039;s failure to grant the refund, and that factual basis was accepted as reasonable cause for the default. On those facts, the penalty order was cancelled.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 17:18:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=97759" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (9) TMI 85 - ITAT BOMBAY-E</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59306</link>
      <description>Penalty under section 15B of the Wealth-tax Act was held unwarranted where the assessee&#039;s outstanding income-tax refund exceeded the wealth-tax liability and repeated requests had been made for adjustment or release before filing the return. The non-payment of wealth-tax was treated as attributable to the revenue&#039;s failure to grant the refund, and that factual basis was accepted as reasonable cause for the default. On those facts, the penalty order was cancelled.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59306</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>