<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (1) TMI 155 - ITAT BOMBAY-E</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59304</link>
    <description>A closely held company&#039;s stock-in-trade of gold, silver, ornaments and precious stones was treated as includible in net wealth because the statutory description of specified assets was clear and could not be narrowed by reference to ministerial speech or by implying an exclusion. The later amendment excluding stock-in-trade was held prospective and not applicable to the period in dispute. Advances received from customers against orders were deductible because they were liabilities directly connected with purchasing goods for execution of those orders and therefore related to the taxable assets. The wealth-tax computation was upheld subject to that deduction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 17:14:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=97757" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (1) TMI 155 - ITAT BOMBAY-E</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59304</link>
      <description>A closely held company&#039;s stock-in-trade of gold, silver, ornaments and precious stones was treated as includible in net wealth because the statutory description of specified assets was clear and could not be narrowed by reference to ministerial speech or by implying an exclusion. The later amendment excluding stock-in-trade was held prospective and not applicable to the period in dispute. Advances received from customers against orders were deductible because they were liabilities directly connected with purchasing goods for execution of those orders and therefore related to the taxable assets. The wealth-tax computation was upheld subject to that deduction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59304</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>