<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (5) TMI 113 - ITAT BOMBAY-E</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59293</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled that the write-back of provisions for ascertained liabilities should not be reduced from the profit computed for section 32AB purposes. The term &quot;ascertained liabilities&quot; is relevant for both additions and reductions in profit computation under section 32AB. The matter was then referred back to the Division Bench for disposal of other grounds raised in the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 16:31:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=97746" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (5) TMI 113 - ITAT BOMBAY-E</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59293</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled that the write-back of provisions for ascertained liabilities should not be reduced from the profit computed for section 32AB purposes. The term &quot;ascertained liabilities&quot; is relevant for both additions and reductions in profit computation under section 32AB. The matter was then referred back to the Division Bench for disposal of other grounds raised in the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59293</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>