<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (4) TMI 97 - ITAT BOMBAY-E</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59283</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeals for the assessment years 1970-71 and 1971-72, restoring the Income Tax Officer&#039;s computation using the written down value (WDV) for capital employed. For the assessment years 1972-73 and 1973-74, the Tribunal upheld the CIT (A)&#039;s decision to use WDV due to the retrospective amendment of Section 80J, dismissing the appeals by the assessee-company.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 16:12:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=97736" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (4) TMI 97 - ITAT BOMBAY-E</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59283</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeals for the assessment years 1970-71 and 1971-72, restoring the Income Tax Officer&#039;s computation using the written down value (WDV) for capital employed. For the assessment years 1972-73 and 1973-74, the Tribunal upheld the CIT (A)&#039;s decision to use WDV due to the retrospective amendment of Section 80J, dismissing the appeals by the assessee-company.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59283</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>