<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (6) TMI 80 - ITAT BOMBAY-E</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59263</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, reducing the penalty to the minimum imposable under section 273(a) alone, after considering the Tribunal&#039;s order in the quantum appeal. The Tribunal emphasized the assessee&#039;s obligation to estimate income honestly and reasonably under section 273(a) and found the wide disparity between estimated and actual income supported the penalty imposition. Previous cases cited were distinguished based on specific facts and circumstances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 15:26:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=97716" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (6) TMI 80 - ITAT BOMBAY-E</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59263</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, reducing the penalty to the minimum imposable under section 273(a) alone, after considering the Tribunal&#039;s order in the quantum appeal. The Tribunal emphasized the assessee&#039;s obligation to estimate income honestly and reasonably under section 273(a) and found the wide disparity between estimated and actual income supported the penalty imposition. Previous cases cited were distinguished based on specific facts and circumstances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59263</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>