<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (12) TMI 76 - ITAT BOMBAY-E</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59251</link>
    <description>Section 9(1) of the Estate Duty Act, 1953 was construed as covering an immediate gift inter vivos. On that reading, insurance premium payments made to an insurer under a policy governed by the Married Women&#039;s Property Act were not a gift to the wife merely because the policy benefited her, and they were not a disposition in her favour for section 9(1) purposes. The Tribunal relied on earlier authority supporting that view. The premium payments were therefore outside section 9(1), and the estate duty addition was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 14:58:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=97704" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (12) TMI 76 - ITAT BOMBAY-E</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59251</link>
      <description>Section 9(1) of the Estate Duty Act, 1953 was construed as covering an immediate gift inter vivos. On that reading, insurance premium payments made to an insurer under a policy governed by the Married Women&#039;s Property Act were not a gift to the wife merely because the policy benefited her, and they were not a disposition in her favour for section 9(1) purposes. The Tribunal relied on earlier authority supporting that view. The premium payments were therefore outside section 9(1), and the estate duty addition was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59251</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>