<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (2) TMI 441 - ITAT BOMBAY-E</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59233</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Assessing Officer&#039;s decision to disallow deductions claimed under Section 80L for minor children&#039;s income, as the income was clubbed with the parent&#039;s income under Section 64(1A). The Tribunal ruled that no separate deduction under Section 80L was permissible for such income. The revenue&#039;s appeals were allowed, reversing the CIT(A)&#039;s order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 13:28:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=97686" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (2) TMI 441 - ITAT BOMBAY-E</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59233</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Assessing Officer&#039;s decision to disallow deductions claimed under Section 80L for minor children&#039;s income, as the income was clubbed with the parent&#039;s income under Section 64(1A). The Tribunal ruled that no separate deduction under Section 80L was permissible for such income. The revenue&#039;s appeals were allowed, reversing the CIT(A)&#039;s order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59233</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>