<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (6) TMI 244 - ITAT BOMBAY-E</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59229</link>
    <description>Interest on bonds and debentures was treated as outside the levy of interest tax, so that receipt was excluded from charge. Interest on inter-corporate deposits was treated as falling within the inclusive definition of &quot;interest&quot; as interest on loans and advances, because &quot;advance&quot; was construed broadly and the statute did not expressly exclude such deposits; the levy was therefore upheld on that item, subject to the period already excluded up to 30-9-1991. The assessee&#039;s alternative computation claim at 3/103 was treated as a pure question of law, admitted, and remanded to the first appellate authority for fresh decision after hearing both sides.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Jul 2024 10:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=97682" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (6) TMI 244 - ITAT BOMBAY-E</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59229</link>
      <description>Interest on bonds and debentures was treated as outside the levy of interest tax, so that receipt was excluded from charge. Interest on inter-corporate deposits was treated as falling within the inclusive definition of &quot;interest&quot; as interest on loans and advances, because &quot;advance&quot; was construed broadly and the statute did not expressly exclude such deposits; the levy was therefore upheld on that item, subject to the period already excluded up to 30-9-1991. The assessee&#039;s alternative computation claim at 3/103 was treated as a pure question of law, admitted, and remanded to the first appellate authority for fresh decision after hearing both sides.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59229</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>