<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (8) TMI 320 - ITAT BOMBAY-E</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59223</link>
    <description>An addition for alleged hawala commission is unsustainable where the assessee&#039;s regular books, quantitative stock records, purchase and sale documents, bank entries, octroi papers and transport evidence support the transactions, and sales are received through account-payee cheques. Suspicion, conjecture, and the non-traceability of some purchaser parties are insufficient without tangible material proving that the assessee actually received commission or adopted a colourable device. Where the Revenue fails to establish a direct nexus between the primary facts and the alleged undisclosed income, the addition cannot be upheld and is liable to be deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Jul 2024 12:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=97676" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (8) TMI 320 - ITAT BOMBAY-E</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59223</link>
      <description>An addition for alleged hawala commission is unsustainable where the assessee&#039;s regular books, quantitative stock records, purchase and sale documents, bank entries, octroi papers and transport evidence support the transactions, and sales are received through account-payee cheques. Suspicion, conjecture, and the non-traceability of some purchaser parties are insufficient without tangible material proving that the assessee actually received commission or adopted a colourable device. Where the Revenue fails to establish a direct nexus between the primary facts and the alleged undisclosed income, the addition cannot be upheld and is liable to be deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59223</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>