<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (9) TMI 250 - ITAT BOMBAY-E</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59220</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, upholding the disallowance of carrying forward the loss as the return was not filed within the prescribed time. However, the disallowance of interest and proportionate insurance premium related to plant and machinery was decided in favor of the assessee, as these issues had already been resolved in the assessee&#039;s favor for the previous assessment year and were not contested by the Department.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 12:36:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=97673" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (9) TMI 250 - ITAT BOMBAY-E</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59220</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, upholding the disallowance of carrying forward the loss as the return was not filed within the prescribed time. However, the disallowance of interest and proportionate insurance premium related to plant and machinery was decided in favor of the assessee, as these issues had already been resolved in the assessee&#039;s favor for the previous assessment year and were not contested by the Department.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59220</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>