<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (9) TMI 144 - ITAT BOMBAY-E</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59215</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Miscellaneous Application due to misuse of the process of law and upheld its original conclusions on various alleged mistakes in the Tribunal&#039;s order. However, the Tribunal acknowledged and rectified typographical errors in the order regarding ground numbers and the number of appeals. The Tribunal emphasized that the application appeared to be an attempt to re-argue decided appeals under the pretext of pointing out errors.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 12:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=97668" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (9) TMI 144 - ITAT BOMBAY-E</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59215</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Miscellaneous Application due to misuse of the process of law and upheld its original conclusions on various alleged mistakes in the Tribunal&#039;s order. However, the Tribunal acknowledged and rectified typographical errors in the order regarding ground numbers and the number of appeals. The Tribunal emphasized that the application appeared to be an attempt to re-argue decided appeals under the pretext of pointing out errors.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59215</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>