<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (10) TMI 91 - ITAT BOMBAY-E</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59208</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the department&#039;s appeal regarding the treatment of medical expenses as perquisites under section 40A(5) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, citing precedent in favor of the assessee. However, the Tribunal partially allowed the appeal concerning the deduction of expenses for distributing free whisky samples, ruling that such expenses constituted entertainment expenditure under section 37(2A) of the Act, despite the sales promotion justification provided by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 11:13:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=97661" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (10) TMI 91 - ITAT BOMBAY-E</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59208</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the department&#039;s appeal regarding the treatment of medical expenses as perquisites under section 40A(5) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, citing precedent in favor of the assessee. However, the Tribunal partially allowed the appeal concerning the deduction of expenses for distributing free whisky samples, ruling that such expenses constituted entertainment expenditure under section 37(2A) of the Act, despite the sales promotion justification provided by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59208</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>