<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (2) TMI 135 - ITAT BOMBAY-E</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59207</link>
    <description>The appeal was partially allowed, with the Tribunal setting aside the AAC&#039;s order and restoring the appeal for a fresh decision. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of proper sequencing of appeals related to assessment and section 146 orders, highlighting the need for reevaluation of the issues raised in accordance with procedural requirements and legal considerations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 11:10:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=97660" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (2) TMI 135 - ITAT BOMBAY-E</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59207</link>
      <description>The appeal was partially allowed, with the Tribunal setting aside the AAC&#039;s order and restoring the appeal for a fresh decision. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of proper sequencing of appeals related to assessment and section 146 orders, highlighting the need for reevaluation of the issues raised in accordance with procedural requirements and legal considerations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59207</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>