<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (12) TMI 84 - ITAT BOMBAY-E</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59192</link>
    <description>The delay in filing the appeal was condoned, and the appeal was admitted. The Tribunal&#039;s order was found to contain mistakes that needed rectification. The adverse remarks about the chartered accountant were to be expunged. The majority view prevailed over the dissenting view, leading to the acceptance of the appeal and consideration of the grounds on merits in the future.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Dec 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Dec 2010 14:39:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=97645" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (12) TMI 84 - ITAT BOMBAY-E</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59192</link>
      <description>The delay in filing the appeal was condoned, and the appeal was admitted. The Tribunal&#039;s order was found to contain mistakes that needed rectification. The adverse remarks about the chartered accountant were to be expunged. The majority view prevailed over the dissenting view, leading to the acceptance of the appeal and consideration of the grounds on merits in the future.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Dec 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59192</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>