<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (4) TMI 105 - ITAT BOMBAY-E</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59187</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, canceling the reassessment under section 147(b) as the silver utensils were deemed personal effects, not capital assets. The Tribunal held that the assessing officer lacked jurisdiction to proceed under section 147(b) after proceedings under section 263 were dropped by the Commissioner. The reassessment was deemed unnecessary as a higher authority had already considered and rejected the matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Dec 2010 14:20:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=97640" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (4) TMI 105 - ITAT BOMBAY-E</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59187</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, canceling the reassessment under section 147(b) as the silver utensils were deemed personal effects, not capital assets. The Tribunal held that the assessing officer lacked jurisdiction to proceed under section 147(b) after proceedings under section 263 were dropped by the Commissioner. The reassessment was deemed unnecessary as a higher authority had already considered and rejected the matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59187</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>