<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (6) TMI 65 - ITAT BOMBAY-E</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59179</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the assessee-company, classified as a small-scale industrial undertaking with capital less than Rs. 10 lakhs, was entitled to investment allowance under section 32A of the Income-tax Act. The Commissioner&#039;s decision to disallow the allowance was overturned, and the original orders allowing the investment allowance were reinstated. The Tribunal emphasized the legislative intent to support small-scale industrial undertakings and rejected the Commissioner&#039;s reliance on irrelevant case laws. The assessee&#039;s entitlement to the investment allowance was affirmed, and the appeals were allowed in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Dec 2010 13:51:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=97632" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (6) TMI 65 - ITAT BOMBAY-E</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59179</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the assessee-company, classified as a small-scale industrial undertaking with capital less than Rs. 10 lakhs, was entitled to investment allowance under section 32A of the Income-tax Act. The Commissioner&#039;s decision to disallow the allowance was overturned, and the original orders allowing the investment allowance were reinstated. The Tribunal emphasized the legislative intent to support small-scale industrial undertakings and rejected the Commissioner&#039;s reliance on irrelevant case laws. The assessee&#039;s entitlement to the investment allowance was affirmed, and the appeals were allowed in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59179</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>