<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (10) TMI 112 - ITAT BOMBAY-E</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59156</link>
    <description>A transfer by a company to a group of shareholders was analysed under gift-tax principles and treated as taxable where it was voluntary, without adequate consideration, and not shown to be a genuine family arrangement. The commentary explains that a family arrangement requires a real family dispute or settlement concerning family property, which was absent because the dispute related to company affairs and the company was a separate legal entity. It also notes that exemption under section 5(1)(xiv) applies only to bona fide business gifts made for commercial expediency, and that shareholder benefit does not by itself amount to company business benefit. The transaction therefore remained within the gift-tax net.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Dec 2010 12:59:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=97610" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (10) TMI 112 - ITAT BOMBAY-E</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59156</link>
      <description>A transfer by a company to a group of shareholders was analysed under gift-tax principles and treated as taxable where it was voluntary, without adequate consideration, and not shown to be a genuine family arrangement. The commentary explains that a family arrangement requires a real family dispute or settlement concerning family property, which was absent because the dispute related to company affairs and the company was a separate legal entity. It also notes that exemption under section 5(1)(xiv) applies only to bona fide business gifts made for commercial expediency, and that shareholder benefit does not by itself amount to company business benefit. The transaction therefore remained within the gift-tax net.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59156</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>