<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (2) TMI 128 - ITAT BOMBAY-E</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59153</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of the provision for unfulfilled export obligations and the addition made due to the undervaluation of closing stock. It agreed with the tax authorities that the liabilities were contingent and the valuation method adopted by the assessee was arbitrary and not in accordance with recognized accounting principles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Dec 2010 12:54:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=97607" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (2) TMI 128 - ITAT BOMBAY-E</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59153</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of the provision for unfulfilled export obligations and the addition made due to the undervaluation of closing stock. It agreed with the tax authorities that the liabilities were contingent and the valuation method adopted by the assessee was arbitrary and not in accordance with recognized accounting principles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59153</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>