<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (5) TMI 102 - ITAT BOMBAY-E</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59148</link>
    <description>The ITAT held that the appropriation towards sinking fund from common outgoings rent constituted revenue income and should be included in the total income of the assessee. Contributions to sinking fund were considered part of the rent received, not capital receipts exempt from taxation. The ITAT overturned the CIT (A)&#039;s decision, allowing the appeal by the revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 May 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Dec 2010 12:44:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=97602" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (5) TMI 102 - ITAT BOMBAY-E</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59148</link>
      <description>The ITAT held that the appropriation towards sinking fund from common outgoings rent constituted revenue income and should be included in the total income of the assessee. Contributions to sinking fund were considered part of the rent received, not capital receipts exempt from taxation. The ITAT overturned the CIT (A)&#039;s decision, allowing the appeal by the revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 May 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59148</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>