<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (9) TMI 147 - : ITAT BOMBAY-E</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59132</link>
    <description>Interest on borrowings may be deductible where the expenditure is incurred to earn income or to preserve income-yielding assets, even if income is not actually received in the relevant year, provided a real nexus exists. On the borrowings from the assessee&#039;s wife, the Tribunal treated the funds as used in an arrangement connected with equity participation, release from counter-guarantee obligations, and protection of shareholding and directorship-related income, and allowed deduction under section 57(iii). Interest on bank borrowings had already been allowed subject to quantified limits in an earlier order, and no fresh material justified interference; that allowance remained undisturbed. The departmental challenge therefore failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Dec 2010 12:05:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=97586" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (9) TMI 147 - : ITAT BOMBAY-E</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59132</link>
      <description>Interest on borrowings may be deductible where the expenditure is incurred to earn income or to preserve income-yielding assets, even if income is not actually received in the relevant year, provided a real nexus exists. On the borrowings from the assessee&#039;s wife, the Tribunal treated the funds as used in an arrangement connected with equity participation, release from counter-guarantee obligations, and protection of shareholding and directorship-related income, and allowed deduction under section 57(iii). Interest on bank borrowings had already been allowed subject to quantified limits in an earlier order, and no fresh material justified interference; that allowance remained undisturbed. The departmental challenge therefore failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59132</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>