<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (10) TMI 78 - ITAT BOMBAY-E</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59116</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of initial depreciation for the power generation unit, stating that the installation was not for the business of generation or distribution of electricity. Additionally, the Tribunal ruled that the amount received from Honeywell Inc., USA, was taxable under section 28(ii)(c) as compensation for the termination of the agency agreement, not for the transfer of goodwill. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the decisions of the lower authorities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Dec 2010 11:25:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=97570" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (10) TMI 78 - ITAT BOMBAY-E</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59116</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of initial depreciation for the power generation unit, stating that the installation was not for the business of generation or distribution of electricity. Additionally, the Tribunal ruled that the amount received from Honeywell Inc., USA, was taxable under section 28(ii)(c) as compensation for the termination of the agency agreement, not for the transfer of goodwill. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the decisions of the lower authorities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59116</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>