<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (10) TMI 77 - ITAT BOMBAY-E</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59115</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal by determining that the surplus from compensation and sale proceeds should be treated as capital gains, not business income. The matter was remanded to the Income Tax Officer for computation. However, the Tribunal upheld the treatment of ground rent as income from other sources, disallowance under section 40A(8) for interest on unsecured loans, and the treatment of loss from race horse breeding as a capital loss.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 Feb 2011 03:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=97569" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (10) TMI 77 - ITAT BOMBAY-E</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59115</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal by determining that the surplus from compensation and sale proceeds should be treated as capital gains, not business income. The matter was remanded to the Income Tax Officer for computation. However, the Tribunal upheld the treatment of ground rent as income from other sources, disallowance under section 40A(8) for interest on unsecured loans, and the treatment of loss from race horse breeding as a capital loss.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59115</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>