<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (8) TMI 96 - ITAT BOMBAY-E</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59094</link>
    <description>The Tribunal determined that there was a dissolution, not retirement, of the partnership firm. The amounts received by the assessee were considered as the value of his share in the partnership firm upon distribution of capital assets, falling within section 47(ii) and thus not taxable. The appeal succeeded, directing the ITO to exclude the disputed amounts from the assessee&#039;s taxable income during assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 18:43:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=97548" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (8) TMI 96 - ITAT BOMBAY-E</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59094</link>
      <description>The Tribunal determined that there was a dissolution, not retirement, of the partnership firm. The amounts received by the assessee were considered as the value of his share in the partnership firm upon distribution of capital assets, falling within section 47(ii) and thus not taxable. The appeal succeeded, directing the ITO to exclude the disputed amounts from the assessee&#039;s taxable income during assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59094</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>