<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (1) TMI 118 - ITAT BOMBAY-E</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59089</link>
    <description>The judgment focused on the computation of property income under the Income-tax Act, 1961, based on a leave and licence agreement. The court upheld the decision of the Income Tax Officer (ITO) to calculate income using the licence fee as rent received, applying section 23(1)(b) of the Act. The distinction between &#039;letting&#039; and &#039;licensing&#039; was crucial in determining property income, with the court emphasizing that a licence does not confer an interest in the property to the licensee. The judgment also highlighted the importance of fixing the annual value based on rental value, particularly in prime areas, and dismissed the appeals while partially allowing an appeal related to the levy of interest for a specific assessment year.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 18:34:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=97543" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (1) TMI 118 - ITAT BOMBAY-E</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59089</link>
      <description>The judgment focused on the computation of property income under the Income-tax Act, 1961, based on a leave and licence agreement. The court upheld the decision of the Income Tax Officer (ITO) to calculate income using the licence fee as rent received, applying section 23(1)(b) of the Act. The distinction between &#039;letting&#039; and &#039;licensing&#039; was crucial in determining property income, with the court emphasizing that a licence does not confer an interest in the property to the licensee. The judgment also highlighted the importance of fixing the annual value based on rental value, particularly in prime areas, and dismissed the appeals while partially allowing an appeal related to the levy of interest for a specific assessment year.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59089</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>