<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (9) TMI 101 - ITAT BOMBAY-E</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59085</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision denying the assessee-company&#039;s claim for depreciation under section 32(1)(vi) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. It concluded that the assessee&#039;s activities of joining and laying down pipes did not amount to &#039;manufacture&#039; or &#039;production&#039; of new articles as required by the law. The appeal was dismissed, affirming that the assessee did not meet the statutory criteria for claiming depreciation on the machinery used in its business.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 18:26:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=97539" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (9) TMI 101 - ITAT BOMBAY-E</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59085</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision denying the assessee-company&#039;s claim for depreciation under section 32(1)(vi) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. It concluded that the assessee&#039;s activities of joining and laying down pipes did not amount to &#039;manufacture&#039; or &#039;production&#039; of new articles as required by the law. The appeal was dismissed, affirming that the assessee did not meet the statutory criteria for claiming depreciation on the machinery used in its business.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59085</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>