<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (8) TMI 126 - ITAT BOMBAY-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59069</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal in part. It directed that the claim for deduction of expenses related to sick mills should be allowed, upheld the rejection of claims under Section 35B, reversed the addition of notional interest due to the change in accounting method, dismissed the claim for fees paid to the Registrar of Companies, and confirmed the rejection of the claim for deletion of income not agitated before the ITO.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 17:34:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=97523" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (8) TMI 126 - ITAT BOMBAY-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59069</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal in part. It directed that the claim for deduction of expenses related to sick mills should be allowed, upheld the rejection of claims under Section 35B, reversed the addition of notional interest due to the change in accounting method, dismissed the claim for fees paid to the Registrar of Companies, and confirmed the rejection of the claim for deletion of income not agitated before the ITO.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59069</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>