<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (1) TMI 153 - ITAT BOMBAY-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59068</link>
    <description>The ITAT Bombay-D partly allowed the appeal, rejecting the claim for bad debt or capital loss regarding an outstanding loan, modifying the disallowance of telephone expenses, and adjusting the cost of office premises to a higher figure as per the assessee&#039;s working. The decision emphasized that since the right to receive the outstanding amount was not lost, it could not be treated as a bad debt or capital loss, distinguishing it from a previous Gujarat High Court decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 17:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=97522" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (1) TMI 153 - ITAT BOMBAY-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59068</link>
      <description>The ITAT Bombay-D partly allowed the appeal, rejecting the claim for bad debt or capital loss regarding an outstanding loan, modifying the disallowance of telephone expenses, and adjusting the cost of office premises to a higher figure as per the assessee&#039;s working. The decision emphasized that since the right to receive the outstanding amount was not lost, it could not be treated as a bad debt or capital loss, distinguishing it from a previous Gujarat High Court decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59068</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>