<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (1) TMI 194 - ITAT BOMBAY-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59067</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed both appeals, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to disallow interest paid for discounting bills linked to financial accommodations for RTI. The Tribunal found the interest expenditure not wholly and exclusively for business purposes, emphasizing the lack of evidence supporting claimed business benefits from the RTI relationship. The disallowance was upheld as the interest paid was deemed not directly related to the assessee&#039;s business activities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 17:31:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=97521" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (1) TMI 194 - ITAT BOMBAY-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59067</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed both appeals, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to disallow interest paid for discounting bills linked to financial accommodations for RTI. The Tribunal found the interest expenditure not wholly and exclusively for business purposes, emphasizing the lack of evidence supporting claimed business benefits from the RTI relationship. The disallowance was upheld as the interest paid was deemed not directly related to the assessee&#039;s business activities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59067</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>