<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (6) TMI 64 - ITAT BOMBAY-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59053</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal, overturning the CIT&#039;s order and reinstating the ITO&#039;s decision to grant the investment allowance to the assessee for job work activities. The ITAT held that the job work activities qualified as manufacturing, as per relevant precedents, and the processed products constituted new essential items, aligning with the definition of manufacturing under the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 17:06:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=97507" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (6) TMI 64 - ITAT BOMBAY-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59053</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal, overturning the CIT&#039;s order and reinstating the ITO&#039;s decision to grant the investment allowance to the assessee for job work activities. The ITAT held that the job work activities qualified as manufacturing, as per relevant precedents, and the processed products constituted new essential items, aligning with the definition of manufacturing under the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59053</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>