<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (9) TMI 119 - ITAT BOMBAY-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59028</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed both the departmental appeal and the cross objection filed by the assessee regarding relief under section 35B of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal upheld the assessee&#039;s eligibility for relief under section 35B based on its business activities, disagreed with the disallowance of depreciation on a motor car, and ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the classification of expenses as entertainment or gifts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 16:17:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=97483" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (9) TMI 119 - ITAT BOMBAY-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59028</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed both the departmental appeal and the cross objection filed by the assessee regarding relief under section 35B of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal upheld the assessee&#039;s eligibility for relief under section 35B based on its business activities, disagreed with the disallowance of depreciation on a motor car, and ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the classification of expenses as entertainment or gifts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59028</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>