<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (9) TMI 98 - ITAT BOMBAY-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59020</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, restricting the disallowances for car expenses and depreciation while upholding the disallowance of sales promotion expenses and the claim under section 35B due to insufficient evidence supporting the business purpose of the expenditures.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 15:59:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=97475" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (9) TMI 98 - ITAT BOMBAY-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59020</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, restricting the disallowances for car expenses and depreciation while upholding the disallowance of sales promotion expenses and the claim under section 35B due to insufficient evidence supporting the business purpose of the expenditures.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59020</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>