<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (7) TMI 129 - ITAT BOMBAY-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59018</link>
    <description>Delayed appeals were condoned where the delay arose from the assessee&#039;s representative, and the assessee was not to be penalised for that lapse. The omission to personally sign the memoranda of appeal was treated as a curable irregularity, not a defect rendering the appeals void ab initio. The appeals were restored, and the assessee was to be given an to rectify the memoranda before disposal on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 15:57:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=97473" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (7) TMI 129 - ITAT BOMBAY-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59018</link>
      <description>Delayed appeals were condoned where the delay arose from the assessee&#039;s representative, and the assessee was not to be penalised for that lapse. The omission to personally sign the memoranda of appeal was treated as a curable irregularity, not a defect rendering the appeals void ab initio. The appeals were restored, and the assessee was to be given an to rectify the memoranda before disposal on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59018</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>