<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (10) TMI 63 - ITAT BOMBAY-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59015</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner (A)&#039;s order and directed the matter to be re-evaluated by the ITO in accordance with the law. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of the ITO making an independent decision based on a thorough investigation, rather than relying on the conditional offer made by the assessee. The decision highlighted the need for proper assessment procedures and the importance of factual verification in tax matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 15:52:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=97470" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (10) TMI 63 - ITAT BOMBAY-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59015</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner (A)&#039;s order and directed the matter to be re-evaluated by the ITO in accordance with the law. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of the ITO making an independent decision based on a thorough investigation, rather than relying on the conditional offer made by the assessee. The decision highlighted the need for proper assessment procedures and the importance of factual verification in tax matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59015</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>