<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (3) TMI 102 - ITAT BOMBAY-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59009</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the CIT&#039;s decision to disallow the claimed loss of Rs. 19,552 under &quot;Capital Gains&quot; on the sale of cars. The Tribunal held that the car could be classified as a capital asset for income tax purposes, despite being considered a personal asset in wealth-tax proceedings. Consequently, the claimed loss was deemed eligible for set off against other income, emphasizing that the capital loss on the transfer of the car should be considered under &quot;Capital Gains.&quot;</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 15:41:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=97464" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (3) TMI 102 - ITAT BOMBAY-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59009</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the CIT&#039;s decision to disallow the claimed loss of Rs. 19,552 under &quot;Capital Gains&quot; on the sale of cars. The Tribunal held that the car could be classified as a capital asset for income tax purposes, despite being considered a personal asset in wealth-tax proceedings. Consequently, the claimed loss was deemed eligible for set off against other income, emphasizing that the capital loss on the transfer of the car should be considered under &quot;Capital Gains.&quot;</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59009</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>